hi guys! this is a comic i made for a final in my comics in literature class. we had to do a research paper on a topic we’d discussed in class and then accompany it with a comic with a relevant subject. my paper was about hyper-sexualization of women in comic books, but i decided to broaden it out here as well as personalize it and make myself the subject and discuss something i’ve been subjected to in the convention circuit and on the internet as well as thousands of other women, as well as give a cue to thought about how the comic book industry as well as the video game industry and even just media in general (all of which are male dominated) push such ridiculous pressures onto girls and women.
also, it feels kind of silly to have to add this since i hope it’s obvious, but i am very aware that there are men that don’t subscribe to this attitude, and am incredibly grateful that these issues are brought to light to people other than the ones that are subjected to it.
anyway haha i have literally been staring at this for 9 hours i don’t even know which direction is up anymore. thanks for reading!!!
Experts Say ‘Sexbots’ Will Eliminate STIs, Provide Life-Lengthening Orgasms
Futurists are theorizing that robots will be cultivated to give humans life-extending orgasms, and some suggest that the scenario could be here as early as 2050.
Unlike human partners, robots will be ready and willing whenever we are, and equipped to do things that human partners simply cannot.
NO I’M A LITTLE SCARED AND THE ETHICS ARE ALSO A LITTLE SCARY
but what if they gain sentience
why are you treating that as a bad thing
ok this would be great because of the skyrocketing amount of stupid men who SERIOUSLY DON’T KNOW EITHER WHERE, OR SOME EVEN DON’T KNOW /WHAT/ A CLITORIS IS, so c’mon science robots x ladies for life.
43730
here we have a wonderful piece of 13th century art
wow isn’t that just majestic okay let’s take a little closer look at this masterful work
oh
It’s like they had tumblr in the thirteenth century
"I just noticed something strange on Wikipedia. It appears that gradually, over time, editors have begun the process of moving women, one by one, alphabetically, from the “American Novelists” category to the “American Women Novelists” subcategory. So far, female authors whose last names begin with A or B have been most affected, although many others have, too.
The intention appears to be to create a list of “American Novelists” on Wikipedia that is made up almost entirely of men. The category lists 3,837 authors, and the first few hundred of them are mainly men. The explanation at the top of the page is that the list of “American Novelists” is too long, and therefore the novelists have to be put in subcategories whenever possible.
Too bad there isn’t a subcategory for “American Men Novelists.”
"
Wikipedia’s sexism toward female novelists (via explore-blog)
IMPORTANT UPDATE the author, Amanda Filipacchi, from Sunday:
“In an Op-Ed article I wrote, published on The New York Times’s Web site on Wednesday, I suggested it was too bad that there wasn’t a subcategory for “American Men Novelists.” And what do you know; shortly after, a new subcategory called exactly that appeared.
But there was more. Much more. As soon as the Op-Ed article appeared, unhappy Wikipedia editors pounced on my Wikipedia page and started making alterations to it, erasing as much as they possibly could without (I assume) technically breaking the rules. They removed the links to outside sources, like interviews of me and reviews of my novels. Not surprisingly, they also removed the link to the Op-Ed article. At the same time, they put up a banner at the top of my page saying the page needed “additional citations for verifications.” Too bad they’d just taken out the useful sources.
In 24 hours, there were 22 changes to my page. Before that, there had been 22 changes in four years. Thursday night, a kind soul went in there and put back the deleted sources. The Wiki editors instantly took them out again.”
(via glintglimmergleam)
Wikipedia is a great resource and actually a really terrible place full of awful people
(via ravenqueered)
HERE is the talk page of the primary wiki editor involved in making these changes. Please feel free to judge for yourselves the sort of person he is.
(via drinkmasturbatecry)
Again I say: and Wikipedia continues to be shocked by the low percentage of female editors on their site.
(via killsmedead)Why Dove’s “Real Beauty Sketches” Video Makes Me Uncomfortable… and Kind of Makes Me Angry
33694So this video started going around my facebook today, with about a dozen of my female friends sharing the link with comments like, and “Everyone needs to see this”, and “All girls should watch this,” and “This made me cry.” And I’m not trying to shame those girls! I definitely understand why they would do so. And I don’t want to be a killjoy. But as I clicked the link and started watching the video, I started to feel a slight sense of discomfort. I couldn’t put my finger on why that was, exactly, but it continued throughout the whole thing. After watching the video several more times, I have some thoughts…
[“Oh Gods,” said Character (Fanfic Flamingo) Character lives in a monotheistic society and has never shown any sign of polytheistic beliefs in canon or fic.]
this is the best joke of the year
[x]
So often, modernizations and movie adaptations get a bad rap, and those who love the heart and soul of the original works fume at them with just indignation. But every once in a while, the adaptation isn’t bad. Every so often, they bring old worlds to new people, and that’s the best thing there is.
God bless this post.
(Source: gold-titaniumalloyman)
Still unable to get over John in this gif. Nobody has ever looked so adorable in their entire existence.
Sherlock: dead body dance.
John: cute overload.
Greg: I hate my life.
Always, always reblog for the wonderful tags..<3
(Source: bennylafitte)
(Source: lefeuvre)
(Source: starkedindustries)
(Source: angelina-germanotta)




